🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had come from mediators to restart negotiations with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Path

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader declaring the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states employed their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions restart.

The US president last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting clear proposals from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of international law, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the clash could not be ended by military means. He stated the assaults commenced with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith hard to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had consistently attempted to impose their desires during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and stays the ultimate resolution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, regulations and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this attack."